COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL PARAMETERS OF LUNG IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

Authors

  • Sefika Umihanic University Clinical Center Tuzla, Clinic for Lung Diseases and TBC
  • Sabina Nuhbegovic Tuzla University School of Medicine, Department of Physiology
  • Selmira Brkic Tuzla University School of Medicine, Department of Pathophysiology
  • Farid Ljuca Tuzla University School of Medicine, Department of Physiology
  • Sead Jamakosmanovic University Clinical Center Tuzla, Clinic for Lung Diseases and TBC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5457/ams.v37i1.67

Keywords:

COPD, spirometry, pletismografy, blood gas analysis, smoking

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disorder characterized by maximal expiratory flow decrease and slow forced lung exhalation, which are significantly unchanged over several months. Subjects and Methods: Our study included 100 patients, 50 males and 50 females, diagnosed COPD who have been tested by functional lung tests: spirometry, body plethysmography and blood gas analysis. Patients have been analyzed at Clinic for pulmonary diseases and TBC, University Clinical Center Tuzla. All tests have been done at Department for Cardiorespiratory Diagnostics. Results: In this study have shown highly significant correlation among following parameters: FEV1 and VC, FEV1 and FEF 25, FEV1 and FEF75/25, FEV1 and FEF75, FEF25 and FEF75/25, FEF75 and FEF75/25. In males FEV1, VC and FEV1/VC have been significantly decreased comparing to females. Our results have shown no significant deference among spirometry, plethysmography and blood gas analysis parameters in male smokers with COPD comparing to female smokers. It has been found significant difference for pCO2 in male comparing to female nonsmokers. Conclusion: According to the results we recommend that all individuals having chronic cough, dyspnea and wheezing, and who are smokers or ex-smokers, aged >45 years, considering BMI, should be tested by spirometry.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2008)

Section

Original papers

License

Copyright transfer

The listed authors warrant that they are the authors and sole owners of the submitted manuscript. The authors also warrant that the work is original; that it has not been previously published in print or electronic format and is not under consideration by another publisher or electronic medium; that it has not been previously transferred, assigned, or otherwise encumbered; and that the authors have full power to grant such rights. With respect to the results of this work, the manuscript of this or substantially similar content will not be submitted to any other journal until the review process in the Acta Medica Salinianana has been officially completed (acceptance or rejection of the manuscript). The paper will not be withdrawn from the review process by the Acta Medica Saliniana Editorial Board until the review process is completed. The authors will comply with the requests of the Acta Medica Saliniana Editors and reviewers to improve the paper for publication. The eventual disagreements will be submitted in a written form; the authors are aware that the disagreement(s) with the Acta Medica Saliniana requests may result in the rejection of the manuscript. The authors hereby grant to the Acta Medica Saliniana the right to edit, revise, abridge, and condense the manuscript. If the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Acta Medica Saliniana, the authors hereby transfer the copyright of the paper to the Acta Medica Saliniana. The authors permit the Acta Medica Saliniana to allow third parties to copy any part of the journal without asking for permission, provided that the reference to the source is given. For papers with more than one author: All other co-authors agree to allow the corresponding author to make decisions regarding prepublication release of the information in the paper to the media, federal agencies, or both.