Suspected Clopidogrel Resistance in Patient with Recurrent Coronary Stent Thrombosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5457/ams.v39i1.108Keywords:
stent, coronary disease, clopidogrel resistance, thrombosisAbstract
Despite aggressive antiplatelet therapy in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention, the incidence of stent thrombosis remains approximately 0.5% to 0.8%. We report on a 53-year-old male patient with recurrent coronary stent thrombosis treated by coronary re-interventions and anticoagulation. Initial diagnostic selective coronary angiography revealed 90% proximal circumflex coronary artery stenosis in a patient with 3rd degree of stabile angina by Canadian Cardiology Society classification. After premedication with a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel, 300 mg aspirin and intravenous enoxaparine 1 mg/kg, a bare-metal stent was implanted. The initial postprocedural course was normal. On the third day after the intervention, the patient was subjected to reintervention because of the stent thrombosis, and on the fifth day after reintervention - to the third percutaneous coronary angioplasty, also because of the stent thrombosis. Clopidogrel resistence was suspected and treatment with warfarin was initiated, after which there were no new cardiac events. Three months later, anticoagulation was discontinued, and as an antiplatelet agent aspirin 100 mg daily remained in therapy. Up to now (one-year), follow-up of the patient has been uneventful. In the case of suspected clopidogrel resistance, alternative therapeutic options have to be considered, like introducing per os anticoagulation (e.g. warfarin), introducing ticlopidin instead of clopidogrel, or, in the near future, possibly introducing prasugrel, a similar agent currently in transition from investigation into clinical use.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright transfer
The listed authors warrant that they are the authors and sole owners of the submitted manuscript. The authors also warrant that the work is original; that it has not been previously published in print or electronic format and is not under consideration by another publisher or electronic medium; that it has not been previously transferred, assigned, or otherwise encumbered; and that the authors have full power to grant such rights. With respect to the results of this work, the manuscript of this or substantially similar content will not be submitted to any other journal until the review process in the Acta Medica Salinianana has been officially completed (acceptance or rejection of the manuscript). The paper will not be withdrawn from the review process by the Acta Medica Saliniana Editorial Board until the review process is completed. The authors will comply with the requests of the Acta Medica Saliniana Editors and reviewers to improve the paper for publication. The eventual disagreements will be submitted in a written form; the authors are aware that the disagreement(s) with the Acta Medica Saliniana requests may result in the rejection of the manuscript. The authors hereby grant to the Acta Medica Saliniana the right to edit, revise, abridge, and condense the manuscript. If the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Acta Medica Saliniana, the authors hereby transfer the copyright of the paper to the Acta Medica Saliniana. The authors permit the Acta Medica Saliniana to allow third parties to copy any part of the journal without asking for permission, provided that the reference to the source is given. For papers with more than one author: All other co-authors agree to allow the corresponding author to make decisions regarding prepublication release of the information in the paper to the media, federal agencies, or both.
