Outcome Prediction in Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5457/ams.v39i2.103Keywords:
lumbar disc herniation, microdiscectomy, outcomeAbstract
Introduction: It is a well recognized fact that a significant proportion of patients operated on for lumbar disc herniation exhibit a poor outcome, regardless of the apparent technical success of the operative procedure itself. Aim: to identify a set of widely available variables that accurately predict short-term outcome after discectomy and to develop a predictive model based upon those variables. Patients and methods: Basic demographic, clinical and radiological variables were evaluated in a group of 70 patient operated on for disc herniation. Outcome was assessed using VAS and RM scales 6 months postoperatively and correlated to aforementioned variables. Results: Preoperative pain intensity and duration, age and type of disc herniation were all shown to be statistically significant predictors of short-term outcome, unlike sex, type of radiological investigation and preoperative tension sign testing results. Multivariate regression analysis including only variables previously identified as good outcome predictors revealed that the pain intensity exhibited the strongest correlation with outcome, followed by pain duration, type of disc herniation and age. Even though MR scan was more sensitive in detecting disc extrusion than CT (sensitivity of 100% versus 65%, respectively), the presence of preoperative MR scan did not influence the outcome. Conclusion: The study identified a set of widely available and easily attainable variables as fair predictors of short-term outcome after lumbar discectomy. Subsequent logistic regression resulted in a predictive model whose accuracy is to be determined in another prospective study.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright transfer
The listed authors warrant that they are the authors and sole owners of the submitted manuscript. The authors also warrant that the work is original; that it has not been previously published in print or electronic format and is not under consideration by another publisher or electronic medium; that it has not been previously transferred, assigned, or otherwise encumbered; and that the authors have full power to grant such rights. With respect to the results of this work, the manuscript of this or substantially similar content will not be submitted to any other journal until the review process in the Acta Medica Salinianana has been officially completed (acceptance or rejection of the manuscript). The paper will not be withdrawn from the review process by the Acta Medica Saliniana Editorial Board until the review process is completed. The authors will comply with the requests of the Acta Medica Saliniana Editors and reviewers to improve the paper for publication. The eventual disagreements will be submitted in a written form; the authors are aware that the disagreement(s) with the Acta Medica Saliniana requests may result in the rejection of the manuscript. The authors hereby grant to the Acta Medica Saliniana the right to edit, revise, abridge, and condense the manuscript. If the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Acta Medica Saliniana, the authors hereby transfer the copyright of the paper to the Acta Medica Saliniana. The authors permit the Acta Medica Saliniana to allow third parties to copy any part of the journal without asking for permission, provided that the reference to the source is given. For papers with more than one author: All other co-authors agree to allow the corresponding author to make decisions regarding prepublication release of the information in the paper to the media, federal agencies, or both.
