Colorectal cancer screening in Tuzla canton: Project and strategy for patients with average cancer risk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5457/ams.v54i1.783Keywords:
colorectal cancer, screeningAbstract
Background: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) can identify premalignant lesions and detect asymptomatic malignant tumors at an early stage that have a better chance of healing, but also longer-term better treatment outcomes. Screening has been shown to reduce mortality from CRC. The aim of this paper is comprehensive education of health care professionals in the Tuzla Canton about this disease, adoption of new guidelines and simpler route from diagnosis to surgical treatment,which ultimately leads to reduced mortality and better outcomes in treatment. Material and methods:The project included family medicine specialists, surgeons and gastroenterologists, 100 of them. The education project was led by two surgeons, who implemented the guidelines ofthe American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) 2021, when it comes to screening CRC. Results: None of the participants offered all correct answers in tests, prior to the training, in both groups of doctors. For a post-educational test, data suggest that there has been a noticeable improvement in the results. In a group of doctors with over 10 years of service, 71 (98.61%) answered correctly all the questions offered and only 1 (1.39%) between 5 and 9 correct answers. For a group of doctors with less than 10 years of service, 26 (92.86%) provided all correct answers and only 2 (7, 14%) between 5 and 9 correct answers.Conclusion: This project pointed to the necessary education of healthcare professionals in this area, who are involved in early detection programmes for CRC, especially family medicine specialists, surgeons and gastroenterologists.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright transfer
The listed authors warrant that they are the authors and sole owners of the submitted manuscript. The authors also warrant that the work is original; that it has not been previously published in print or electronic format and is not under consideration by another publisher or electronic medium; that it has not been previously transferred, assigned, or otherwise encumbered; and that the authors have full power to grant such rights. With respect to the results of this work, the manuscript of this or substantially similar content will not be submitted to any other journal until the review process in the Acta Medica Salinianana has been officially completed (acceptance or rejection of the manuscript). The paper will not be withdrawn from the review process by the Acta Medica Saliniana Editorial Board until the review process is completed. The authors will comply with the requests of the Acta Medica Saliniana Editors and reviewers to improve the paper for publication. The eventual disagreements will be submitted in a written form; the authors are aware that the disagreement(s) with the Acta Medica Saliniana requests may result in the rejection of the manuscript. The authors hereby grant to the Acta Medica Saliniana the right to edit, revise, abridge, and condense the manuscript. If the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Acta Medica Saliniana, the authors hereby transfer the copyright of the paper to the Acta Medica Saliniana. The authors permit the Acta Medica Saliniana to allow third parties to copy any part of the journal without asking for permission, provided that the reference to the source is given. For papers with more than one author: All other co-authors agree to allow the corresponding author to make decisions regarding prepublication release of the information in the paper to the media, federal agencies, or both.
