The Outcomes of Chronic Low Back Pain in Physio-General Medicine management. A prospective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5457/ams.v50i1-2.507Keywords:
Low back pain, family Medicine, Pain Killer, Physiotherapy, Young, Adult, Elderly.Abstract
Introduction: Acute or chronic lumbar pain is very disabling and it negatively affects quality of life. There are several guidelines related to the management of low back pain (LBP), but some studies on the quality of care, provided in the field of general medicine, are judged to be in contrast with them. The objective of this study is to analyze the management of the LBP in the practice of Italian general medicine and compare it with the recommendations of the guidelines.
Materials and methods: In this observational study, in a general medical center, 50 patients suffering from chronic LBP were enrolled. All patients, assessed on a case-by-case basis, have been given personalized therapies for their LPB, according to SIOT guidelines in agreement between orthopedic and general practitioner. The monitoring took place over a period of 12 weeks. We evaluated: adherence to therapy; consumption of pain medication daily, second-level diagnostic tests performed post-therapy; The Short Form (12) Health Survey for the evaluation of the quality of life; the VAS for pain and Oswestry Low Back Pain Score for the objective evaluation of the quality of life related to the lumbar spine.
Results: In the 35 (70%) patients who adhered to the therapy according to guidelines we had an increase in quality of life, a reduction in pain, a decrease in drug therapy and the performance of II level diagnostic tests compared to 15 ( 30%) who did not adhere to the therapy according to guidelines. However, in both groups an increase in drug consumption was seen 6 months after the evaluation endpoint.
Conclusions: The family doctor plays a fundamental role in the management of chronic pain.
Patient education plays a key role in therapy and favorable outcomes in patients with LBP.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright transfer
The listed authors warrant that they are the authors and sole owners of the submitted manuscript. The authors also warrant that the work is original; that it has not been previously published in print or electronic format and is not under consideration by another publisher or electronic medium; that it has not been previously transferred, assigned, or otherwise encumbered; and that the authors have full power to grant such rights. With respect to the results of this work, the manuscript of this or substantially similar content will not be submitted to any other journal until the review process in the Acta Medica Salinianana has been officially completed (acceptance or rejection of the manuscript). The paper will not be withdrawn from the review process by the Acta Medica Saliniana Editorial Board until the review process is completed. The authors will comply with the requests of the Acta Medica Saliniana Editors and reviewers to improve the paper for publication. The eventual disagreements will be submitted in a written form; the authors are aware that the disagreement(s) with the Acta Medica Saliniana requests may result in the rejection of the manuscript. The authors hereby grant to the Acta Medica Saliniana the right to edit, revise, abridge, and condense the manuscript. If the manuscript is accepted for publication in the Acta Medica Saliniana, the authors hereby transfer the copyright of the paper to the Acta Medica Saliniana. The authors permit the Acta Medica Saliniana to allow third parties to copy any part of the journal without asking for permission, provided that the reference to the source is given. For papers with more than one author: All other co-authors agree to allow the corresponding author to make decisions regarding prepublication release of the information in the paper to the media, federal agencies, or both.
